Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Flood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Flood[edit]

Jenny Flood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The Order of Australia Medal (the lowest class of the Order of Australia) is awarded to hundreds (averaging "around 450") of people each year, and does not guarantee notability. Flood's work does not appear to have received any coverage in independent sources. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete fails GNG. 5 results for "Jenny Flood" on Google News. All are mentions and not about her. CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Has anyone notified the creator and asked them to expand the article a bit? Montanabw(talk) 18:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article's creator hasn't edited since August 2014, and the article itself was created ten years ago. IgnorantArmies (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing else imaginably better for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.