Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Dell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems sufficient consensus per the additional sources that GNG and BASIC have both been satisfied. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Dell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable person. Two newspaper articles that mention she dated, then married, a minor sports figure does not constitute notability. If more information were to be added beyond "she dated/married" that would be a different thing, but this has been a problem for over a year and not addressed.

All of this information can be contained in a sentence in her husband's original article. TheDoctorX (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reformatted nomination so that it will display properly. Technical work only. I am neutral (so far). Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redirect to Will Middlebrooks.~~ Change to keep based on Hirolovesswords' sources. Rlendog (talk) 19:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has received significant coverage including [1][2][3][4][5][6] - Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think that the references identified by Hirolovesswords are enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: now seems well-enough sourced for GNG. PamD 08:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is established to pass WP:GNG AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Delete: One to two sentences are not "Notable." I would prefer, however, addition to the article which includes details such as her actual biography, work history, et cetera which would not only make it "Notable" it would improve the article as a whole.TheDoctorX (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need for the nominator to !vote delete since the nomination itself is a statement to delete. In any case, notability is not based on the current state of the article but on the independent reliable sources that are available, whether or not incorporated in the article. Rlendog (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is not since I was happy with Merge or improving the article from about three sentences on a person whose only notability is she dated a ball player as I clearly indicated.TheDoctorX (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Hirolovesswords. Ejgreen77 (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the coverage of her in her professional career. I understand the AfD discussion, though. SportingFlyer talk 07:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.