Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Wakeman Parade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jennifer Wakeman Parade[edit]
- Jennifer Wakeman Parade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable TV movie, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:Notability and no reliable sources. HairyPerry 18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 23:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Show on a well established children's channel. Also a movie of My Life as a Teenage Robot so perhaps a merge would be possible. But certainly this TV movie that has been aired and watched is notable, right? ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it doesn't seem to be - see WP:N. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a section for TV shows? I only saw film. I guess I based my judgement on my memory of reading that shows are notable, and in fact there seem to be many articles on individual episodes of shows... But if indeed I'm setting the bar too low then I would suggest a merge to the parent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it doesn't seem to be - see WP:N. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nada on Gnews, a mere 6 hits on Google, most prominent of which is the Wikipedia article. Unless I messed up my queries or Google inexplicably failed to document it, fails WP:N by a mile. RayAYang (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this just has to be a hoax. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.