Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer L. Wesp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jennifer L. Wesp[edit]
- Jennifer L. Wesp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject isn't notable and the page contains unclear and possibly factually incorrect info that can not be addressed without original research —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.219.159 (talk) 22:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this is not my AFD, I'm good-faith submitting it for the IP who wanted it. tedder (talk) 11:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no refs, no indication of notability. (GregJackP (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Poorly sourced biography of a living person that does not indicate how she is notable. The only reference is to faqs.org, and only briefly mentions the subject. That source, disregarding the question of its reliability, only supports the claim that "Alt.polyamory was founded by Jennifer Wesp on May 29, 1992"; other content in that article is unverified. I also cannot find any other coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Intelligentsium 02:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.