Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Greenberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Greenberg[edit]

Jennifer Greenberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. Appears to be self-promotion. --- Possibly 17:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly 17:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly 17:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Neutral Difficult to see the failed WP:GNG argument, as a published author and with a significant number of articles published in the media. Am I missing something? WCMemail 12:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I am open to voting keep, but none of the sources cited in the article seem to satisfy all of the criteria of WP:GNG - they are all either interviews (therefore not secondary sources), not independent, or not significant. Also, simply being a published author is not grounds for inclusion under WP:AUTHOR. Were you able to find any additional sources that I might be missing? Niftysquirrel (talk) 13:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Wee Curry Monster: In this version of the article, sources 2, 3, 4 and 5 are written by her. As Niftysquirrel says, being an author who gets published does not contribute to notability. It is independent writing about the subject that we are looking for, and there is not enough of it here. --- Possibly 19:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I was basing my comment on a brief look at the find sources link, as I found references for her straight away. I don't think there is a strong case for notability but I'm seeing enough to convince me that this is worth a keep. But I'm not going to die in a ditch over it, if others disagree with me. WCMemail 06:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should list some if you have the time. Searches are often location-dependent, so when I searched I got things like "Jennifer Greenberg strives to create a comfortable and professional atmosphere for NAC clients when planning their events." I did not see good RS on her as a writer. --- Possibly 07:06, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It seems some of the ones I found were for a different person, my mistake. WCMemail 12:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.