Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Gale (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Gale[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, does not fulfill Wikipedia:Notability (politics) - Mooonswimmer 15:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Sexuality and gender, and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lean delete: Obviously does not pass WP:NPOL, so just basing your !vote off of that is useless. That said, while there is a fair bit of coverage in the Texas press about her death, there is not too much in the way of WP:SIGCOV to pass her over just being a person of local interest, meaning this does not appear to be a WP:GNG pass. Curbon7 (talk) 17:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lean delete There is a bunch of coverage in the Texas Press, both from Austin and in Dallas. The Dallas Morning News had two stories after her death, one of the death and another noting that the Austin City Council was honoring the subject. There also is some mentions (from Fox News) and others that the subject's death "sparked an outcry" and some homeless shelters were changing their policies in the aftermath of the subject's death. That said, while I can squint to see a WP:GNG pass, I keep ending up at the same place as Curbon7 and Bearcat in the nomination statement in the first AFD, that this doesn't quite meet WP:GNG for an international encyclopedia. (Please ping if additional sources are found). --Enos733 (talk) 18:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Not Notable, She is only candidate for the elections (not a winner). Contributor008 (talk) 15:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, this is a useless vote. Anyone with eyes or a screenreader can see she obviously does not pass WP:NPOL, and so should be assessed with WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.