Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Chrisler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn as the article has seen significant improvement. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Chrisler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a former executive director of an organization, not making any strong or properly sourced claim to passing our inclusion criteria for leaders of organizations. As written, the article's notability claim boils down to "person who had a job", which isn't an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of a properly demonstrated WP:GNG pass on sourcing that analyzes the significance of her work in the job -- but the sole source being used to support the article is a deadlinked Q&A interview in an alternative weekly newspaper, which isn't enough coverage to get her over GNG all by itself.
I am willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access to archived American media coverage from 15-20 years ago than I've got can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it -- but the page has been tagged for notability since 2010 without ever having any new content or sourcing added to bolster her basis for inclusion, so it's long past time to pull the "fix it or lose it" trigger. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment plenty of hits in GNews with her name, not sure if it's for this person. Leaning delete, the info presented here seems pretty routine. Oaktree b (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added information and sources to the article that support WP:GNG/WP:BASIC notability. Beccaynr (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reviewing the history, it is clear why it was nominated, but also thanks to Beccaynr's work now meets GNG. Sufficient information over time in RS to write a fairly complete biography of the subject and confirm WP notability. SusunW (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have also emphasized her advocacy in the opening paragraph to make this clearer. AnnMarie Johnson (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Beccaynr (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very impressed by the complete re-write done by Beccaynr! Lamona (talk) 03:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the fix, Beccaynr. As promised, I'm withdrawing this, since it's now clearly in a much better and more keepable state. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.