Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeni Couzyn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. Drmies (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeni Couzyn[edit]

Jeni Couzyn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails both WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. Wiedemann has published just three chapbooks (pamphlets) with a small press. Her BLP misrepresents her as having published a book of verse. Her work has received no critical attention. The single source sited in the BLP is a promotion from a local writers' cooperative. Wiedemann has no significant internet presence other than a self-published site. Not to be confused with an eminent German academic of the same name. NotAJF (talk) 08:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy withdraw nomination. Total newbie balls-up with Twinkle. Apologies. I meant to nominate the Barbara Wiedemann article. NotAJF (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.