Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Crab
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 03:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jen Crab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Concern was "Nonsense, this is probably an attack page." Highly unlikely to be a genuine scientific breakthrough. Delete Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. Also there are no sources to prove discovery. Delete Bishop11 (talk) 16:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be a joke. If real then article could be written anew. I noticed that no scientific name was given for the newly discovered species. Steve Dufour (talk) 17:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination, without sources there is no way to prove this is not a hoax. RFerreira (talk) 19:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no prejudice to recreation post-publication in a peer reviewed scientific journal. But I doubt that will ever happen. Jclemens (talk) 20:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - see above Averell (talk) 08:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.