Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jellybabies (band)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jellybabies (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no real notability shown. lacks sources showing notability Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Above is the prod reason. deletion was disputed by article creator and band member on the talk page. prod removed and brought to afd. Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A7 Doesn't assert notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per the reasons outlined by TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) above. The article does not have references to prove notability, nor does it have any mention of notability in the article. The Earwig (Talk | Editor review) 18:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the A7, radio play asserts importance, short of wp:music but a (weak) claim is still there. I still say delete. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conversation taking place on the discussion tab of the article itself. --122.106.42.4 (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Couldn't find any significant coverage, but will reconsider if any is forthcoming. If someone declines a proposed deletion and sees fit to bring an article to AFD, can we just let it run its course please, as adding speedy tags just disrupts the process.--Michig (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.