Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Worboys
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 21:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jeffrey Worboys[edit]
- Jeffrey Worboys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article originally PRODded by me with the comment "Non-notable business person. The "references" do not actually refer specifically to Mr. Worboys at all" The PROD was disputed by the author of the article in an incorrectly formatted AfD with the comment "I'll update the sources so they better reflect 'notableness'... Give me a couple of days." The good faith attempt to create the AfD has been deleted to allow the creation of a correctly formatted page. Mattinbgn\talk 04:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 04:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Sounds like a very important person, but there's nothing in the article to justify it being here. - Longhair\talk 06:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sounds like one of the tens or hundreds of millions of exceptionally accomplished individuals who are not notable in the sense of meriting inclusion in an encyclopedia. Bongomatic (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 05:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — as stated above by the contestor of the PROD, it's been more than a few days, now. No verifiable secondary sources establishing notability. MuZemike (talk) 07:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I'm unable to find any substantial sourcing beyond that in the article which doesn't meet WP:BIO. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.