Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey O'Brien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 22:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey O'Brien[edit]

delete not notable enough a person; self-promotion Mayumashu 02:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Asserts some notability, but doesn't meet WP:BIO. Royboy crashfan 02:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Company manages $250 mil., which is not much. The company is probably notable enough, but not the CEO. dbtfz ^talk 03:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, looks quite notable, but doesn't meet WP:BIO. --Ter e nc e Ong 12:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite notable. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For what? Help us out here. dbtfz ^talk 23:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO.--Isotope23 17:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable, reads like vanity or self-promotion. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. If the company grows larger or he does something.. Maybe then. Staxringold 23:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep seems to have some notability. Arbusto 09:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Seems like promotion. —GrantNeufeld 03:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.