Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Jey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Eiffel 65#Brekup and reformation. Keeper | 76 00:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Jey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As it seems, there is not enough information on the subject itself from Eiffel 65 and I suggest this article either be deleted until more info is found by another source or whatever info is on here be taken into the article Eiffel 65. I might have to think about the other members, as well, as making it's own "Members" section in that article, but like the one in the One Direction article. EditorE (talk) 03:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Eiffel_65#Breakup_and_reformation - It seems he has been with Eiffel 65 the longest and a Google News search provided the most results (several of the links are Italian). Searches for the other groups provided a few results but this one seems to be the one he is best known for. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.