Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Glanz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 07:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Glanz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic. Does not meet either WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Originally put up as an extensive CV it was cleaned-up a lot but still the only reference is a faculty bio.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet wp:academics. Has publications that have been cited >200 times, but that is not extraordinary. His own web page does not list professional awards that would qualify him. LaMona (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sourced article started recently by SPA. My searches on this relatively unique name show nothing beyond the sort of articles in academic journals that one expects academics ot publish, but nothing that indicates notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.