Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Alexander Sterling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Parent5446 ☯ ^{(msg email)} 01:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Alexander Sterling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly clear case of WP:BLP1E. He was arrested last week for leaking information to an NYT reporter, which has caused the recent media coverage; the only other "big" thing he did is trying to sue the CIA for racial discrimination, which failed, back in 2002. The latter, as far as I can tell, was not a major incident and I don't think it's enough to discard the BLP1E situation. Neither do the two combined make him worthy of inclusion here, BLP1E or not. (He was never a ranking CIA official or anything.)

I also would like to advise against the creation of a separate article about the information leak, which some might propose to address the BLP1E issue. This is just the latest in a series of information leakages by government officials that the Obama administration is cracking down on; unless something is the scale of United States diplomatic cables leak, this seems to be actually a not-very-rare occurrence that doesn't have much more than routine news coverage to establish notability. /ƒETCH COMMS / 01:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I favor deleting this article for the reason stated above. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (from the creator of the article) - if the indictment turns out to be true, the person is the original sources for the information on Operation Merlin and the book State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. Also, the indictment is based on the Espionage Act of 1917, as is Bradley Manning's indictment, which puts in on a similar scale. Charges under the Espionage Act for mishandling classified information are indeed a "very-rare occurrence" - fifth time this has now happened since the law was passed in 1917, i.e. 94 years ago. -- Enemenemu (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Have to fully agree with Enemenemu.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

addition to my posting above (from the creator of the article): WP:BLP1E is not justified. The discrimination case had received national (e.g. People Magazine, MSNBC) and international (ABC Radio National) news coverage. -- Enemenemu (talk) 21:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The sources are major news outlets covering an eight or nine year period. Location (talk) 00:32, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.