Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jefferson Muzzles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The last four comments were made by SPAs, as all have only edited this page and nothing else. —Kurykh 00:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Jefferson Muzzles

Jefferson Muzzles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Possibly there's a notable topic in there, but at the moment it's a charged, POV rant that is entirely unreferenced and borders on defamation at times. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 15:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless it can be adequately sourced. Note there is not an article on the organization itself. JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 15:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, almost speedy, Rant is an understandment, as is defamation. Not encyclopedic in tone, regardless of other merits. Pharmboy 16:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per notable sources on google news Corpx 01:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Adequate if you do a google search for Muzzle Awards then you get a lot more hits, and can see it is covered by reputable sources. Also the entry was only recently created so it may still be under development.
• Keep If you look at the Rudy Giuliani Controversy page, you can see another legitimate Muzzle reference. While the entry may look weak now, we should give it some time to further develop before it is deleted on the basis of being too short/small.
• <3 I don't see why you are so upset with this article. A quick google search reveals that the muzzles are well covered in the press, including the Washington Post. My vote is to keep it. Fabulous article!
• Muzzlicious. I did a search on Joshua Wheeler, the center's associate director, and he's kind of a big deal. He has written an article in a University publication,which well describes the intent of the muzzles. Keep up the good work Josh, YOU ROCK!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.