Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Szusterman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 23:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Szusterman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per apparent consensus at the mass nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Szusterman, I am restarting an individual AfD for every stub created by Hunter Bradley (talk · contribs) for actors of dubious relevance. All of these stubs were created with only an IMDB entry as a source, and only minor roles in Power Rangers Samurai are asserted. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Jeff Szusterman article now asserts more than just one voice role. And now seen doing more that just voice work, he appears to be pushing at WP:ENT [1] and seems to have decent enough coverage in New Zealand.[2] Article is improvable and this one does not require deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think it is borderline, but there is a fairly good interview of him and his wife [3], and some reviews for 3 plays he's directed [4] [5] [6] [7] (also, the Drammy award mentioned on his website can be confirmed here) — frankie (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been expanded and sourced accordingly. While still awaiting an article, the Drammy award can be considered as notable to New Zealand theater as a Tony or Obie or Drama Desk Award would be to the United States. That would have him pass WP:ANYBIO. Nice research, by the way. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Not the most notable of entertainers, but I suppose it is good enough. Moogwrench (talk) 01:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Moogwrench. Sb617 (Talk) 10:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.