Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Roland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (natter) 10:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff Roland[edit]
- Jeff Roland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am not convinced that this French painter is notable per WP:BIO or WP:ARTIST. I find no reliably sourced third-party coverage of him, and the museums in which his works are said to be exhibited (the Davis Museum and the Museum of Everything) do not appear to be notable. Sandstein 13:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources, and his work does not appear to be in the permanent collection of notable museums and galleries. -- Whpq (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not satisfy notability requirements...Modernist (talk) 20:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait. I have contacted the subject and he has provided several different references. I am not a proficient French speaker and I am not familiar with these sources, so I will leave it to other editors to properly identify these sources.
and others.
theMONO 00:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Change opinion to keep. Thanks for providing the sources. Some of this coverage is superficial or not in reliable sources, but in aggregate it does indicate that the subject is taken seriously and reported on as a professional painter in France. Sandstein 10:11, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.