Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Koke
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeff Koke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poss conflict of interest as article appears to have been created by subject. no sourced claim to notability. seems like a personal resume page. Tracer9999 (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Have sourced the two Origins Awards, which means he meets Wp:ANYBIO clause 1--the Origins awards are the major awards in his field. Jclemens (talk) 19:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- JN466 21:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- JN466 21:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as award-winner, yep. -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Awards do show notability, but article does currently read too much like a resume. PWilkinson (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.