Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Corsaletti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Malcolm (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Corsaletti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league baseball figure. Never reached big leagues, so he fails WP:BASE/N. Coverage seems WP:ROUTINE. Alex (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per WP:NCOLLATH, "Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team." Corsaletti was a third team All-American. Enough said.--TM 21:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third team All-Americans are hardly notable. Alex (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? He was named to a nationally recognized all-American team, thus gaining "national media attention as an individual". Show me where the guideline says third team all-american's fail NCOLLATH?--TM 21:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about this guy... third-team all-americans in baseball arent necessarily notable by themselves. no vote for me at this time. Spanneraol (talk) 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep It passes WP:NCOLLATH, well known and notable to have an article, well written enough to keep. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's getting to the point where I'm ready to vote Keep on anything Alex nominates, reflexively. This is looking more than a little pointy. Ravenswing 17:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. WP:SNOW. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.