Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jed Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jed Taylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find sufficient independent secondary sourcing to sustain this biography. On the one hand much of the career took place pre-Internet so sources I haven't been able to find may exist; on the other, it does not seem to be material likely to have generated a lot of coverage (local radio host; small connections to more notable figures). Innisfree987 (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable local radio personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88^(talk) 15:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Is it the first time that this article is nominated for the deletion? -- Gprscrippers (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SoWhy declined my A7 a year ago; I should've just PROD'ed in the first place (my mistake) but after the declined speedy, entries aren't eligible for PROD anymore. So I left it a while just to see and there has been some tinkering, but no improvement as far secondary source coverage is concerned. Hence the AfD nomination. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.