Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Bonds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Bonds[edit]

Jeanne Bonds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Serving as the mayor of Knightdale, North Carolina (population 17,000) is not enough to satisfy WP:NPOV. The rest of the material is LinkedIn-style WP:PROMO nonsense. KidAd talk 02:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - mayors are not inherently notable, the article reads very promotionally, and cleaning it up still won't make her notable. SportingFlyer T·C 10:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A good attempt but it describes her career, nothing notable. Longer article with not much substance. Oaktree b (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Article is written like a puff piece. Lefcentreright Talk | Contribs | Global 19:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete virtually no mayors of places with less than 20,000 people at present are notable. This is not one of the cases where we would see an exception to that general rule of thumb.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.