Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Aristide Constantin Georges Caradja
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GedUK 18:39, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jean Aristide Constantin Georges Caradja[edit]
- Jean Aristide Constantin Georges Caradja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable private individual with no apparent claim to notability except that he is a distant descendant of a family of nobility (great-great-great-grandfather was once a "Kaimakam" of Walachia), in a country where nobility titles have no legal currency. Per WP:BIO, notability is not inherited and mere relation to notable people does not make a subject notable in Wikipedia's terms. Only source given is a family tree of unknown provenance, apparently privately compiled and self-published, on somebody's website. Most other biographical claims are entirely unsourced. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Interesting and notable father and interesting family in general, but neither is a claim to notability. Wikipedia does not create a separate article for every line in the Gotha. (Or rather, some people do just that, but many have to be deleted.) We might be able to get him through on the WP:ACADEMICS ticket, but I found no evidence of research after he got his doctorate. Hans Adler 13:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust Talk Contribs 22:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of personal notability.Anonimu (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.