Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Serge Brisson (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Serge Brisson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. Has never been elected, lead a party that has never held a seat.--User19004 (talk) 20:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Keep That he doesn't meet POLITICIAN has no relevance given the previous AFD found numerous sources. Why User:User19004 is another AFD necessary, given the sources listed in the previous one? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 7. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15? Nfitz (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Nfitz, previous AFD found to be notable and notability cannot be lost. Also User19004 is a sock, so not sure if the re-nom for AFD is really valid. Samsmachado (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Commment - yes as it's created by a sock for a blocked user, it's eligible for speedy close under criteria 4 and probably 2 as well. Nfitz (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.