Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz and Jess (webcomic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete CSD A7, based on what the article said: "The website has a small and loyal fanbase, however it... suffers from lack of notice, due to there being no advertisment of the comic beyond... word of mouth and... myspace" - No assertion of notability whatsoever. Awyong J. M. Salleh 14:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jazz and Jess (webcomic)

The article was prodded, but the prod was removed so I bring it here. Non-notable webcomic. Google brings forth a mere 14 unique hits for "Jazz and Jess". It has no Alexa ranking at all. The official forum has 52 registered members which doesn't illustrate a great deal of popularity. The article was initially created by one of the webcomic writers but it was deleted. He posted the content of the original article on his forum for others to add it again. IrishGuy ^talk 23:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability not established. bogdan 23:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a webcomic with only 14 Ghits doesn't seem notable to me. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 23:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delelte I request the page be given more time as both writer and artist are currently trying to advertise the comic with other sites and are using this wikipedia page as reference. Duke Palmer, Writer for Jazz and Jess

Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising. As the writer for Jazz and Jess it is a conflict of interest for you to have written the article as well as for you to be involved with this AfD. IrishGuy ^talk 18:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to satisfy WP:NOTE & WP:WEB, conflict of interest and prior deletion a factor.Freepsbane 18:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletions. -- Sid 3050 04:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We're sorry if this deletion inconveniences you, but the page should never have been created in the first place. If you snuck onto my backyard and built a tree house, should I let it stay because you invited all your friends over? - Richfife 18:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete The author admits to using Wikipedia for advertising purposes, so it should be deleted quickly, perhaps even speedied as db-spam. JuJube 10:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The author admitted to advertising it on OTHER websites, but using wiki for *reference*. This is a web comic that has reached users allover Britain - I'm from the North East of England and it is widely read at my place of work and my university, and among friends, for example KJS1982 10:16, 19 February 2007

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.