Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Perrin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Perrin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability Nswix (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Perrin a legitimate competitor in the UFC and fighting a the main event of the prelims on a major card.

It's his third fight for the promotion, in addition to competing on DWCS.

Compare to his competitor tonight who has only fought on DWCS. Blackguise (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Not even close to meeting WP:NMMA, or WP:GNG. How did this get made in the first place? ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 01:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Per WP:MMABIO Criteria supporting notability, point 1.

- 2 Bellator fights, and 2 UFC fights. About to have a 3rd UFC fight tonight. Per WP:MMATIER Blackguise (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blackguise: Please note that WP:NMMA is the relevant guideline. WP:MMABIO is outdated, the guidelines for sports (including MMA) were changed in March (see WP:NSPORTS2022). I cannot answer why MMABIO has not been updated as it causes confusion, but they are not the official guidelines anymore. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 02:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MMABIO's been updated. Ravenswing 16:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Massachusetts. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only mentions are MMA Junkie or MMA Fighting websites, neither of which are RS. Oaktree b (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet the relevant notability criterion, and no evidence he meets the GNG. Only coverage out there in reliable sources is routine sports coverage and casual mentions. Ravenswing 16:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Note: MMA Junkie and MMA Fighting are independent and reliable sources. However, subject fails GNG or NMMA to meet the notability creteria. Cassiopeia talk 05:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.