Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Hudson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jay Hudson[edit]
- Jay Hudson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Subject has "won" a couple of local best of awards, but no substantial awards. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any indepth, independant, and reliable coverage of this individual either. I find little indication they meet the minimum requirements for an article as outlined at WP:N or WP:BIO. --Jayron32 00:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Falls under WP:BLP1E. Rirunmot 02:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rirunmot (talk • contribs)
- Delete unable to find independent sources on this person. WookieInHeat (talk) 04:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for djs. The award he received is not significant. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.