Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Curlee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Curlee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable businessman; promo-pushing article. There is less here than meets the eye. Quis separabit? 05:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete rather than redirect to one of two articles that mention him as my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing considerably good aside from various links for the filmmaking. SwisterTwister talk 18:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:41, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - promo advert, web searches turn up social media and some rare trivial mentions. Fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG Kraxler (talk) 23:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.