Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Cunning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kevin (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Cunning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having difficulty judging notability, but I can't see any independent reliable sources in the first few pages of Google, and we appear to have an unreferenced autobiography. dramatic (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The following non-trivial, independent, third-party sources were found on gnews: here, here, here, and here translated. Should suffice for WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 01:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree. The Google news results show others by that same name, but the ones about the music man are clearly notable coverage. Dream Focus 03:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How about adding the sources to the article instead of jumping about saying they're there?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Comment: I did, right after I !voted. J04n(talk page) 04:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just unable to see any independent reliable sources in the first few pages of Google does not mean the article is not verifiable or notable. Please view other pages of Google then decide whether it is notable or not.--RekishiEJ (talk) 06:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. J04n(talk page) 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - GNews results presented by J04n demonstrate that the subject passes the general notability guideline.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 01:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.