Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Advertising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Advertising[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Searching for source WP:BEFORE, I only found sources talking about a co-founder and winning a non-notable award. [1] Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mottezen (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is also clearly a promotional article. Mottezen (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most recent significant edit was made by someone with a name that indicates a connection to the company so clearly a COI here. Aside from this, no semblance of notability. ser! (chat to me). 23:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Overly promotional, but more importantly does not meet WP:NCORP. Searching finds directory listings but no in-depth sig coverage in independent sources. MB 23:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notable coverage found, mostly local sources. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, Sources fails WP:NORG. Cuoxo (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for UPE, sockpuppetry. MER-C 18:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per above.-- Alcremie (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.