Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javed Naqvi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 19:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Javed Naqvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable journalist DimaG (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep – I believe that Mr. Naqvi has generated just enough 3rd party news coverage to qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia, as shown here [1]. However, I am going back to the article to eliminate POV material. ShoesssS Talk 20:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a newspaper columnist, he does not generate news, it appears that he only reports about it. He does not appear to be the anchor for the 7 o'clock news (thus a household name). Reporting newsworthy items as a columnist certainly does not automatically confer notability. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - another non-notable working stiff of the press. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC) just another non-notable working stiff of the press[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.