Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javablackbelt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Javablackbelt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks sources, inadequate RS found in search. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, appears to be a small company that got bought up and disappeared, one ref in the article, google and books showing some historic coverage, no lasting impact and likely never notable. Szzuk (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's a little unclear whether this could clearly be said to fall under NCORP (hatnote aside), but whether NCORP, GNG or NWEB I don't believe notability is satisfied. I couldn't find any suitable sourcing that indicates notability was ever satisfied by the website. Couldn't see an evident reasonable redirect target. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.