Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaume Marxuach i Flaquer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Calella. Davewild (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jaume Marxuach i Flaquer[edit]
- Jaume Marxuach i Flaquer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Also, I suspect a possible hoax. Only 49 Googles. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article most definitely not a hoax.Marenach (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article important within confines of its class 72.221.92.43 (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No English references. Article on Catalan wikipedia exists but only has same reference. --Thetrick (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Calella. At least for now, then in the Calella article we can see if it's sourced.--T. Anthony (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The original concern wp:n hasn't been addressed. The one comment that it isn't a Hoax (which I have no comment on) gave no evidence as such. The keep above claims "important within confines of its class " but doesn't state why. And as for redirect, if notability cannot be established, why redirect? The article needs some sources, which should be enough to address notability Faradayplank (talk) 21:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggested that as he's in the article Calella anyway. If the workers on that article determine he's a hoax or non-notable he can be removed from that article and then the redirect can be deleted.--T. Anthony (talk) 04:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A fine suggestion ... Redirect to Calella. Faradayplank (talk) 06:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggested that as he's in the article Calella anyway. If the workers on that article determine he's a hoax or non-notable he can be removed from that article and then the redirect can be deleted.--T. Anthony (talk) 04:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.