Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatt & Juliet 2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Jatt & Juliet#Sequel. J04n(talk page) 13:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jatt & Juliet 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD tag removed. Unreleased future film. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. Fails WP:MOVIE. Assertions like "all time blockbuster". Might be in the future. As yet unreleased per the article itself. Alexf(talk) 00:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article calls the the film's predecessor "all-time blockbuster", not this film. The film is to be released next month (i.e. production is basically complete), so WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply. Coverage in reliable sources exists, e.g. Times of India. Pburka (talk) 01:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Jatt_&_Juliet#Sequel. Given the amount of coverage the first film received, it's likely that this film will gain coverage enough to merit its own article at some point in time. Likely, but not guaranteed. I think that for right now it's enough to just redirect to the main article for the first film, where there's a section for any sequel news. The biggie here is that until we have that coverage, we can't justify it having a separate article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.