Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatin S. Wahane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Cryptic per WP:CSD#A7. Given the repeated re-creation (three times without the middle initial before this one), I will also protect it. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jatin S. Wahane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability (nor a credible claim of importance, but A7 was contested) for this student. He does not come close to WP:NPROF, and the only secondary source is a brief mention of his participation in a school science project when he was a child, so WP:GNG is also not met. (Regarding the publication that is mentioned in the article, see this MfD discussion). Jatin Wahane which was rather identical has been speedily deleted three times. bonadea contributions talk 19:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 19:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Recreation of a page for a non notable individual. Moved to Mainspace when AfC was declined. Have requested Speedy Deletion too. Hagennos (talk) 02:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The user keeps creating the page, though it's obviously about an individual who lacks notability. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 04:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.