Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Unruhe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Unruhe[edit]

Jason Unruhe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)} – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, not notable Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Addendum While the article has been expanded since the beginning of this AFD, almost all the references are self-sourced articles written by the subject himself; the article lacks credible, third party citations. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Subject comes up quite a bit in a Google search but only mentioned in passing, nothing detailing him to establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing in-depth, only passing mentions. Even the passing mentions are very few. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the edit history says that I removed the PROD, but I have literally no recollection of doing that,and it appears tohave been an error. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral a lot of edit history results when searching "Maoist Rebel News". Not many good sources though. Jamesjpk (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:SOAP. The news for which he writes is notable, but not him. This is little more than soapboxing. Bearian (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.