Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason International Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jason International Company[edit]

Jason International Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could've PRODded this but I wanted a consensus to give it weight (in case of recreation) for this non-notable company with no good coverage. Although I'm not actually from Arkansas, I'm a frequent visitor and I'm not familiar with this company and it's not a major employer of the area. The best my searches found was this (only one page) and this (nothing significant). It's from December 2008 and although it has quite a bit of info, there aren't any good sources and I'm not seeing any signs of improvement. This is mentioned at Remo Jacuzzi and although his article looks better, I'm not sure how notable he is. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of US-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 07:15, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 14:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the article spends most of its words on Remo Jacuzzi and the Jacuzzi family. Nothing shows that the subject itself meets WP:ORG notability.--Rpclod (talk) 03:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.