Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Goldlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 14:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Goldlist[edit]

Defeated city council candidate with only limited claim to notability apart from that; page created by User:Goldlist and hence most likely WP:VANITY. Previously had a {{prod}} notice on it, which was removed by an anon IP with no discussion or reason given. Delete, sez I, though I'd settle for a userfy, too. Bearcat 08:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete see WP:NOT guideline 1.7 (6) Genealogical entries. Criteria calls for "some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety" as can be measured by "external sources (on or off-line)." This article does not contradict the guideline, and I believe adds to WP, definitely does not detract. Ottawa politics (contribs) 18:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article as it has made an impact and is noteworhty in the small local community of Fredericton - Just because I've never heard of that city, it is the capital of the province of New Brunswick and has evidently left an impact there. Does the criteria of wikipedia call only for national or international notoriety? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.137.17.140 (talk • contribs) . All of this user's edits have been on the current subject.

Yes, actually, the criteria of Wikipedia do call for that. Bearcat 16:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable Nuttah68 09:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear vanity. Subject is not notable enough Ydam 10:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn Matthew Fenton (TALK - CONTRIBS) 12:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn NawlinWiki 13:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and vanity.--Auger Martel 14:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn, v. he's notable for being defeated in a seven-month campaign? W guice 21:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, db-bio, being a defeated candidate in a municipal election does not, under any stretch of the imagination, constitute a valid claim to notability. Not to mention that he brings up less than 150 Google hits, almost all of which relate to various academic awards from UNB - pm_shef 22:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Deet 04:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 16:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I live in Fredericton and barely remember this guy. Just for comparison, no current sitting Fredericton city councillor has an article, and even the mayor only has a sub-stub. Kirjtc2 22:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.