Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Gianginis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Gianginis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant roles, nor coverage in any independent reliable sources. Likely autobio with prod removed by the article creator & likely subject of the article. The-Pope (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because not only is this a strong conflict of interest, I still can't find proof that this isn't a hoax. Feel free to correct me if you find evidence that this actor actually exists. (To me it seems all the profiles you find with a Google search were created by the person himself.) Ginsuloft (talk) 15:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- editor definitely has a COI, and as Ginsuloft was saying, this may be a hoax. The only confirmed evidence I can find is of his age (not his DOB). Also, I'm not so convinced that the photo is the user's own work, as it appears as a search result at [1].Qxukhgiels (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think its a hoax, but if you look at his acting roles, all of them appear to be as an extra, featured extra, or minor character with only a few lines. No major roles, so likely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. LionMans Account (talk) 15:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Hi, it's user:Jasongianginis here. All data, pictures and information submitted to wikipedia are accurate, and current. The problem lies therein that the information is autobiographical, however when this page gets edited in future the concern is it will be flagged as "hoax" again. Sourcing references supporting the inclusion of this page on wikipedia will take time to prepare. Also, the personal information contained on the profile is not available to the general public, hence it's inclusion. I understand the need for neutrality, and the page is free to be edited by all. Would a submission to Articles for creation have been a better avenue? Please let me know, thanks. Jasongianginis (talk) 08:04, 14 August 2013 (AEST)
Delete References are either social media or WP:SPS. Failure of reliable independent sources. The article also fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE. WWGB (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing cited at all to support any of the information provided. Websites listed as "external links" are not reliable (ie IMDB, Facebook, Youtube, etc). Also does it meet notability? Per users own comment above it seems there's no information available in public to support. Caffeyw (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, references provided are not reliable to my mind, and most of the roles are bit parts or minor roles. Even if verified, I'm not convinced that this person meets our notability criteria yet. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Comment The closing admin may also wish to consider whether User:Jasongianginis is in breach of WP:FAKEARTICLE. WWGB (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Zero coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.