Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Fox (motivation consultant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Fox (motivation consultant)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Article is primarily based on works written by the subject. The only reference that covers the subject in-depth is a Wordpress blog. Fails WP:GNG and WP:Notability (people). Article was created by a blocked paid editor. Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:33, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article barely even makes an assertion of notability. Vectro (talk) 00:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see passing mentions in a few sources, but the bulk of the sources are social media or self-published. All motivational speakers think that they are notable, due to their personality type. But only a small percentage actually are. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Cullen328 stated above, the subject is covered several times, however his long term work isn't notable. Doing a web search, most results are just little motions of his work and the rest are unrelated content. ///EuroCarGT 01:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. WP:BIO isn't met, and the article is spammy. Nick-D (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Becky Sayles (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.