Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasodhara global media
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jasodhara global media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable media company. No sources and specific information. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 11:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Article says that it is a subsidiary of a larger conglomerate: Jasodhara Global Media is part of the Jasodhara Group founded in 1983. The subject might be covered in an article about the group, if the parent corporation itself is notable; no opinion there yet. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Part of a WP:Walled garden with Jasodhara and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Pradhan, all of which are spammy promo pages for non-notable company and its owner. MuffledThud (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. Ironic that this global media company doesn't seem to have even a homepage, or any web presence outside wikipedia. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Abecedare (talk) 06:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Wikipedians, I appreciate the need for more references to make an article better. However, confining references to the web only definitely shows lack of foresight and wisdom. India is a country that is still far from being webbed substantially to trace every references on it. A true encyclopaedia must reflect facts that can be traced from all sources i.e, print sources, web sources, people and culture etc PiyushsaoPiyushsao —Preceding undated comment added 05:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.