Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Byrne (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jasmine Byrne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio and gng Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails both guidelines Rainbow unicorn (talk) 01:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - well known, 13x interwiki, many nominations to awards. Notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 19:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Subtropical-man. If the number of interwiki links is really important, then we should respect the consensus against inclusion, since more than 250 other wikis do not have an article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 08:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.