Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jascha Heifetz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 21:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jascha Heifetz[edit]

Delete. Vanity article and anecdotes. Jake013 14:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep This is the Heifetz! Dlyons493 Talk 14:55, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep This is hardly a vanity page. just do a google search. this article should not have been nominated for deletion.--Alhutch 15:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Egil 15:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong speedy keep per Alhutch. — ceejayoz ^★ 15:40, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong speedy keep. Shome mishtake shurely. Flapdragon 16:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep ... uh ... merely the most famous violinist who ever lived. Except for maybe Paganini. Antandrus (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as per WP:music. Article establishes notability. The article states he recorded for RCA Victor and cites recordings that he made as well as concert tours he performed. By the way, how can an article on a man who died in 1987 be considered vanity. Capitalistroadster 17:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Is there an admin in the house? So far there has been seven speedy keeps and one delete and I can't see much prospect of more delete votes being added? Capitalistroadster 18:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Possibly bad faith nom --Rogerd 19:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.