Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarrod Carland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Afd discussion runned for 7 days, 3 votes were casted all for keeping, not a single delete vote ofcourse except by nominator. The consensus was for keeping (non-admin closure) Anoptimistix Let's Talk 03:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrod Carland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, written like a prosified résumé and not citing even one piece of reliable source coverage about him, of a musical theatre actor and producer. As always, these are not claims of notability that hand somebody an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists -- he must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 00:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is sufficient WP:NEXIST for this subject to pass WP:GNG. The article does need a rewrite though. It also needs an update and it needs balance. There are reliable secondary main stream media hits on google to do this. There article subject is responsible for organising major award winning events, on more than one occasion; see for example Helpmann Awards for best opera in 2015 (Faramondo) and 2016 (Agrippina), for which there are reliable secondary main stream media sources available. Aoziwe (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoziwe: please put them in then. DrStrauss talk 19:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, when I get the time I will. In the meantime the strong WP:NEXIST should be more than enough to keep the article. (Have done so before - see Stephen Crean for example.) Aoziwe (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree lots of references out there. It does need a rewite/addition with contemporary references to highlight his role in Hobart/Brisbane Baroque and the debacle of its liquidation. Boneymau (talk) 23:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes the GNG and agree with others. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.