Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarred Blakiston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOQUORUM, closing as delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jarred Blakiston

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Only one significant? role in a notable production, the younger version of Daniel Potts (Shortland Street). (Power Rangers might change that in the future but not yet.) duffbeerforme (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sufficient coverage to meet notability requirements. Article needs a tidy up. NealeFamily (talk) 03:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What coverage? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed stance to Delete as the more I reviewed the coverage the less notable he became NealeFamily (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a writer, removing category. I removed a secondary school writing prize from the page (given by his own high school). He is an actor.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.