Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarek Whiteman
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jarek Whiteman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was: Non-notable player who fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Reason for contesting was: The league states it's professional, thus making the players professional athletes. WP:FPL lists the CSL as non-fully pro. Its wikipedia article refers to the league as semi-professional. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per nom, fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 01:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. Non-notable footballers. Fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 16:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Should meet GNG and athlete (or give me the exact point it fails). I find no proof that the league is not professional. Even if it's not, articles should not deleted just because of the league. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - League is only semi-pro (see this link), so both fail WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. J Mo 101 (talk) 23:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.