Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 4 1995
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 15:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
January 4 1995[edit]
- January 4 1995 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'm fairly certain that Wikipedia doesn't have date-specific articles this far back in time - not sure what to do with it? The information is already included elsewhere, in the date and year articles respectively, which is why I am listing it for deletion. roleplayer 00:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I know there was a discussion some time ago (I commented in it!), although I don't know where to find it and therefore can't use it to support my answer (or to weaken it, for that matter), about having specific articles on days. As I said there: it makes sense to have date-specific articles for really important days (a recent example being September 11, 2001), but as this date is surely not one of significance, it doesn't deserve its own article. Nyttend (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just a random day of little lasting significance. Article has practically no information, and no sources.kuwabaratheman (talk) 03:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete like with that great wad of dates from August 2003. 'tis datecruft. X MarX the Spot (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reason for having an encyclopedia article written about it. --DAJF (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—ridiculous for an article topic, and a MOS breach in its formating. Tony (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per others or Merge names into January 4. -Drilnoth (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.