Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janoskians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Janoskians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crystal bol and fails WP:GNG Night of the Big Wind _talk 10:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two mentions from mainstream press cited, where they are the subject of the article.A quick click of the "news" search above also yields this: [1], another mainstream press mention. Seems to pass WP:GNG to me. They also seem to meet the "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following" criterion of WP:ENT. -- The Anome (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It still can be a hype. Night of the Big Wind _talk 11:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Anome's rationale. Article passes GNG and meets a specific criterion of ENT. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 06:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, unfortunately, as they are now officially the next big thing and are making the news for making young girls scream and faint! Janoskians overshadow Karise show The-Pope (talk) 13:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what? If I unbutton my shirt in public girls also scream and faint (in horror, btw). That does not make me noteworthy. Night of the Big Wind _talk 21:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's how people make it to fame these days!

. No, but in all seriousness, Media attention/Significant coverage = WP:SIGCOV; a "cult" following = WP:ENT #2. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 02:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.