Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janne Langehaug Antonsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Janne Langehaug Antonsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This athlete has never competed on international senior level. In addition to what the article says, she finished 11th at the European Juniors in 1993. Won the national championship with a decent enough result, but nowhere near international competitiveness. With 14.52 metres she was probably not in the top 100 in Europe that year (this year the list cuts off at 87th with 15.17 metres. As such does not meet the general notability guideline either. Geschichte (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Off what Geschichte said, the IAAF list for 1999, the earliest year available, cut off at top 50 with 17.51. That is 3 meters off the subject's mark winning the national title - or over a 20% increase needed. Results for the 1993 World Championships, 1995 World Championships, and 1996 Summer Olympics show that the international standard for that time period was about 16-17 meters (only high 20s for # of competitors, but competitors don't always have their best throws at the major meets). Still well off the 14.52 meters she threw. No compelling reason to think she was ever in the top 60 and therefore was never elite. If never elite, then we cannot presume sources exist. So unless we actually see the sources, delete. RonSigPi (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete articles should not be sourced to mere lists. Her performance, as well demonstrated by RonSigPi is clearly below the level needed to be at a place where sources can be presumed to exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.