Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet M. Stenftenagel
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Janet M. Stenftenagel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's subject fails to meet the relevant notability guidelines. YHoshua (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No sources indicate that she comes even close to passing any of the guidelines for the notability of academics. Beyond this all sources are from onrganizations she has connections with, and only show she is active in southern Indiana community affairs in a way that is far below the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.